If global tensions were to escalate into a large-scale conflict, many people would naturally wonder: Where on Earth might be the safest? In the event of World War III, survival would depend on avoiding military targets, political flashpoints, and densely populated economic centers. The most secure locations would likely be those that are geographically isolated, self-sufficient in food and energy, and historically neutral.
While no place on Earth is completely immune to the ripple effects of global war, some countries and regions are far better positioned than others to withstand chaos. Based on geography, political neutrality, access to resources, and distance from conflict zones, here are ten of the safest places if a major war were to break out.
1. New Zealand
New Zealand is one of the most remote nations in the world, located in the South Pacific over 1,000 miles from any major landmass. It has no significant enemies and maintains a policy of non-alignment in global conflicts. With a small population and vast natural resources, it faces fewer strategic threats. The country produces most of its own food and generates nearly all its electricity from renewable sources—primarily hydroelectric and geothermal power. Its isolation, sustainability, and stable government make it a strong candidate for safety during global upheaval.
2. Switzerland
Switzerland has maintained official neutrality for over 200 years, having avoided involvement in both World Wars. Nestled in the heart of Europe, its mountainous terrain acts as a natural barrier against invasion. The country is exceptionally prepared for emergencies: nearly every household has access to a bomb shelter, and national food and supply reserves are maintained at high levels. Switzerland does not belong to any military alliance and focuses on diplomacy rather than defense. These factors greatly reduce its likelihood of becoming a target.
3. Iceland
As an island nation in the North Atlantic, Iceland has no standing army and no hostile relations with other countries. It runs entirely on renewable energy—geothermal and hydropower—making it resilient even if global fuel supplies are disrupted. Iceland is not part of any military alliance and holds little strategic value for warring powers. Its remote location and peaceful foreign policy make it unlikely to be drawn into direct conflict or targeted by attacks.
4. Antarctica
Antarctica is not a sovereign nation, but a continent governed by international treaty. The Antarctic Treaty System, signed by over 50 countries, bans all military activity, nuclear testing, and mineral mining. There are no permanent residents—only rotating teams of scientists. While the extreme cold and lack of infrastructure make long-term survival difficult without preparation, its complete absence of political or military significance means it would likely remain untouched in a global war.
5. Argentina
Located in southern South America, Argentina is far removed from the primary geopolitical tensions of the Northern Hemisphere. It is a major agricultural producer, exporting large quantities of beef, grains, and soy. The country is largely self-sufficient in food and energy, with growing use of renewables. Surrounded by oceans and shielded by the Andes Mountains, Argentina has few external threats and no active military alliances. Its geographic and political distance from global conflict zones enhances its safety.
6. Ireland
Ireland follows a policy of military neutrality and is not a member of NATO or any offensive alliance. This stance has allowed it to remain uninvolved in major wars throughout modern history. Located on the western edge of Europe, it is distant from central European military corridors. Ireland produces enough food to feed its population and has reliable access to clean water. Its economy is not dependent on arms manufacturing or strategic military positioning, reducing its risk of being targeted.
7. Canada (Remote Areas)
While Canada is part of NATO, much of its territory is sparsely populated and far from urban centers. Vast regions of the northern and western interior offer access to fresh water, arable land, forests, and natural resources. These remote areas are difficult to reach and hold little strategic interest for foreign powers. Although major cities could be at risk due to alliances, rural and wilderness regions may provide refuge and long-term sustainability during a crisis.
8. Tuvalu and Other Pacific Islands
Tuvalu, along with nations like Samoa and Kiribati, is among the smallest and most isolated countries in the world. These island nations have no military forces and play no role in global power struggles. They rely on local fishing and agriculture, making them less dependent on international supply chains. Their geographic remoteness in the central Pacific Ocean makes them highly unlikely targets. While logistical challenges exist, their lack of strategic importance offers a degree of protection.
9. Bhutan
Bhutan is a small, landlocked kingdom nestled in the Himalayas between China and India. It has no history of external aggression and maintains a foreign policy of cautious neutrality. The country prioritizes environmental conservation and cultural preservation over military development. Its rugged mountain terrain provides a natural buffer, and its economy is based on subsistence farming and sustainable practices. Bhutan’s focus on peace and self-reliance could help insulate it from global conflict.
10. Chile
Stretching along the western coast of South America, Chile is protected by the Andes Mountains to the east and the Pacific Ocean to the west. It is politically stable and not aligned with major military blocs. Chile produces much of its own food and is expanding its use of renewable energy, including solar and wind power. Southern regions like Patagonia are extremely remote and sparsely populated, offering potential refuge. Its geographic isolation and internal resilience make it one of the safer locations in a time of global instability.
Final Thoughts
No country can guarantee absolute safety in the event of a full-scale world war. However, these ten locations share key advantages: geographic remoteness, political neutrality, food and energy independence, and minimal involvement in global military affairs. While preparation and timing would still be critical, these places offer some of the best chances for safety and long-term survival should the unthinkable occur.
Ultimately, the safest place may not be defined by borders alone—but by how well a region can sustain life when the rest of the world cannot.
